PackMize practical reference

Steel Bar Cutting Optimizer

Reduce one-dimensional waste for steel bars, tubes and profiles by grouping required lengths into stock bars while accounting for kerf and reusable remnants.

By PackMize · Published

Quick answer: For 6000 mm stock, 3 mm kerf and 24 requested cuts (8 × 1450, 6 × 980, 10 × 625 mm), PackMize uses 5 bars at 79.10% useful material utilization. Status: BEST SOLUTION FOUND.

Worked 6000 mm steel-bar example

RequirementValue
Stock6000 mm
Kerf3 mm
Cuts8 × 1450; 6 × 980; 10 × 625 mm
Reusable offcut threshold300 mm
Result5 bars · 24 cuts
Useful material utilization79.10%
StatusBEST SOLUTION FOUND

Why the status matters

The material-length lower bound for this case is four bars, but the current bounded search returns a valid five-bar plan without proving that four is impossible. PackMize therefore says BEST SOLUTION FOUND instead of presenting five as a mathematical optimum. That distinction is intentional and visible to the user.

Model the actual process

For saw cutting, enter blade kerf and any deliberate end trim. For abrasive or thermal processes, the effective material loss can differ. Clamp zones, chuck allowances, damaged ends and heat-affected zones must be represented in the usable stock or trim inputs when they matter.

Use offcuts deliberately

A reusable-offcut threshold keeps the plan from treating every short remainder as equivalent inventory. The CSV export provides the full patterns so remnants can be labelled or returned to stock.

Assumptions

This worked example uses the dimensions entered in PackMize. Material properties, machine rules and operational constraints that are not explicit inputs are not inferred.

Frequently asked questions

Can PackMize optimize tube and aluminium profile too?

Yes when the problem is one-dimensional straight stock: repeated stock lengths and required cut lengths. Cross-section-specific nesting is outside the 1D model.

Why is this example not marked optimal?

Because the returned five-bar solution does not reach the four-bar mathematical lower bound and the bounded exact search did not prove four impossible.

Does it include kerf?

Yes. The example uses 3 mm per separation under the selected terminal-cut policy.

Related references

Linear Cutting Optimizer — Enter your own bar or profile list.
Timber cut list optimizer — A proven-optimal 4800 mm comparison case.
Methodology — How PackMize distinguishes proved optima from best-found results.
Reproduce it: open the pre-filled calculator, keep the stated inputs unchanged and compare the result with the worked example. Engine identifiers and optimality status are shown in the result panel.

← All guides · Benchmarks · Sources · Glossary